How Amazon’s Book Ratings Work

Posted

in

by

How do you rate the books you read?

This is a widely contested topic among readers, whether it’s on Booktok, Facebook, or another platform where people discuss their opinions on the books they read.

Some people won’t leave a rating or review if they feel the book merits less than four or five stars.

Other people won’t rate higher than four stars unless they feel the book was absolutely amazing and incredible.

And still others are a mix between the two, leaving ratings and reviews however they feel, being generous with one stars and five stars alike.

The purpose of this article is NOT to convince you that you should start giving out tons of four and five stars to all the books you read.

As an author, that’s not my place.

Sure, I’d love it if every JAFF book I’d written started getting four and five stars – but just like I don’t love every book I’ve ever read, I also don’t expect every reader to love my books.

We all have things that bother us: certain tropes, typos, the style of writing. It’s also extremely disappointing to pay money for a book (unless, of course, you use Kindle Unlimited!), only for it to not be what you expected.

And I learned the hard way that even though it’s an extremely common practice to use a book’s epilogue as a reader magnet for your newsletter, JAFF readers really hate it, and it will sour the book for them.

So this post isn’t about trying to convince you to rate books higher. Instead, it’s to inform you about one simple thing:

Amazon does NOT take the average of stars when it calculates a book’s rating.

You would think that if a book had a five-star rating and a one-star rating, they would average out to be three stars…. but they don’t.

About six weeks ago, I published my book “A Dear, Sweet Girl,” and I had the epilogue be the freebie for signing up for my newsletter. As you may have seen, it didn’t go well. Sure, I may have gotten 300x the number of signups that I usually do, but it also made a LOT of people angry, and they expressed that anger by leaving 1-star reviews on Amazon.

Now, I’ve had my fair share of bad reviews from my books. Someone doesn’t like the JAFF trope I wrote, or they found more typos than they’d like. But I don’t really read negative reviews anymore, because, to be honest, all they do is make me want to curl into a ball and cry, and quit writing altogether.

But the one thing that stood out the most from all these one-star reviews (other than I should never leave out the epilogue again, lol) was that the math didn’t make sense.

Now, I got my degree in math. I was a middle school math teacher for several years before developing Crohn’s, having kids, and staying home to homeschool them and take care of my health. I love numbers, probably more than I love reading, and with just a few ratings and most of them being so low (which hadn’t happened before), I quickly could see that the average didn’t work out.

So it caused me to do a deep-dive into how Amazon calculates star ratings and reviews. It’s NOT just the average, believe it or not.

There’s actually two different types of giving your opinon on a book:

  • Ratings: those that are just a star, and
  • Reviews: those that have a star and a typed review.

Ratings that have a review attached are weighted more heavily. Additionally, if you are a “verified purchaser” of the book (meaning Amazon sees that you actually purchased or borrowed the book), then your star has more value as well.

According to Amazon’s website, here’s how those ratings are calculated:

Amazon calculates a product’s star rating using machine-learned models instead of a simple average.

These models consider factors such as how recent the rating or review is and verified purchase status. They use multiple criteria that establish the authenticity of the feedback. The system continues to learn and improve over time.

We do not consider customer ratings without an Amazon Verified Purchase status in a product’s overall star rating until a customer adds more details in the form of text, image, or video.

If you want to read more in-depth about how Amazon’s ratings and reviews work, check out this article here.

I bring this all up just to let everyone know that your ratings and reviews DO matter. It takes a lot more to recover from poor reviews, and a 4-star rating may not be worth what you think it is, especially when compared to a 1-star review.

What do you think? How do you rate the books that you read? Do you also leave a review? How do you decide between the star values?

10 responses to “How Amazon’s Book Ratings Work”

  1. Lois Stacey Avatar
    Lois Stacey

    I sort of guessed that, and I did read the epilogue, although I felt it a bit if a cheat to involve me in a further correspondence just to complete reading the story line. One thing I would be anxious to understand, if anyone out there can help, is the strange lettering system some books seem to be given. For example T for mild sexual content. What constitutes mild sexual content. What constitute a P for language. All seems very strange. Who decides, and why do only some books have it. Is there an A* for pure as the driven snow!

    1. Tiffany Thomas Avatar
      Tiffany Thomas

      In my experience, authors choose the ratings themselves, and each person has their own definitions.

  2. Regina Jeffers Avatar

    I learned a great deal from this piece.

    1. Tiffany Thomas Avatar
      Tiffany Thomas

      I’m glad to hear it!

  3. cindie snyder Avatar
    cindie snyder

    I try to review as much as I can and give the book the stars it deserves. I’m not fussy so I am usually happy with what I read. I have given lots of five stars!

    1. Tiffany Thomas Avatar
      Tiffany Thomas

      That is very much appreciated!

  4. Gianna Thomas Avatar
    Gianna Thomas

    Interesting article, Tiffany. They seem to set rules a little bit different from other sites.
    I like some of what they do, but there are also some things that I’m not sure of. I do give ratings 4-5, rarely a 3, but never a 1 rating. Number one ratings seem to kill the overall ratings, and it seems to take forever to bring the overall rating up. Even if a book is not my favorite, since the author has spent time, money and effort to publish a book, I do believe they deserve more than a 1 or 2.
    As to Amazon’s additional steps, I hope they do give a more accurate rating than the simple average of numbers.
    Occasionally, I check a reviewer’s average bad rankings of various items and have found that some are consistently ranking almost everything very low and reviewing like they read with a red pencil in hand in spite of the fact that most of the others for a particular book have given high ratings. It does make me wonder.

    1. Tiffany Thomas Avatar
      Tiffany Thomas

      This is how I feel exactly.

  5. Sue Briggum Avatar
    Sue Briggum

    This is very helpful, and helps me clarify how I review books. I read about 100 JAFFs a year (retired), and my review average on Goodreads is 4.7. If a book is written well and shows some creativity within the context of Austen cannon, I’ll give 5 stars. And I obviously do that a lot given my average (for example, “When Summer Never Came” got a 5 and a 5+ in my personal log of the books I’ve read). I rarely get a JAFF that isn’t worth reading because I rely heavily on reviews on Goodreads or Amazon by readers who comment frequently on the genre and have shown they are fair and reliable. My average is probably influenced by the fact that if I really dislike a book, I just don’t finish it and give no review.

    I only write a review myself if a book is particularly fine, or I see another review that seems unfair and I want to correct the record. After reading this discussion, it occurs to me I should write a brief review more often given how Amazon scores.

    1. Tiffany Thomas Avatar
      Tiffany Thomas

      I truly appreciate how you give your ratings, and I know other authors must as well! Thank you so much.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Always Austen

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading