I have long wondered about this question, and critics have analyzed it from every angle.  There are no clear answers, but here’s what we do know:

  • Austen wrote one black character, Miss Lambe, in the unfinished Sanditon.  Miss Lambe is an heiress of mixed race from the West Indies.
  • Austen read and admired the works of Thomas Clarkson and William Cowper, both abolitionists. 
  • In particular, Austen praised Clarkson’s History of the Abolition of the African Slave Trade, a two volume account that details the brutality of the African slave trade and England’s abolitionist movement.  Austen wrote, “I am as much in love with the author [Clarkson] as ever,” referring to The History.
  • Three of Austen’s brothers were engaged in the abolitionist movement.  Captain Charles Austen wrote of the terrible conditions endured by enslaved people aboard a ship.  Henry Austen served as a delegate to the World Anti-Slavery Convention in London in 1840.  Frank Austen was part of the petition to the House of Commons that ended the slave trade in the West Indies.
Portrait of Thomas Clarkson by Carl Frederik von Breda

Always Austen author Collins Hemingway has an informative post on the above points that offers more details.

Austen’s reading choices and her brothers’ views suggest she may have been sympathetic to the abolitionist movement.  But what do her books say on the subject?  Very little…however, two of her novels, Emma and Mansfield Park, mention the slave trade.  In this post, I’d like to dive into those references.

This site is ending, so I moved this post. Click here to read the rest…and to find out about that “dead silence” in Mansfield Park.

Click the image to visit Kirstin’s website.

6 responses to “How Did Austen Feel About the Slave Trade?”

  1. Alice McVeigh Avatar
    Alice McVeigh

    I suspect Austen WAS an abolitionist but didn’t make this explicit for the same reason that I never mention politics in social media. It’s, quite simply, not best practice. People who agree with you won’t think any better of you, but some readers are BOUND to be affronted. Instead, Austen only gives us tiny clues – as Kirstin says – and as her every biographer has agonised over.

    The bit about governesses never sat well with me, and I’ve thought about it a lot.

    I think it’s personal. The Austen sisters were never threatened with slavery BUT – absolutely worst-case scenario, had their brothers’ support failed them they, just conceivably, MIGHT have had to go out as governesses – lonely, separated, dependent and awful as that would have been. Jane Fairfax’s comparison of governess’s lot with a slave’s is ridiculous, but Austen might have felt a frisson of sympathy with it all the same.

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      Yes, I think the threat of becoming a governess was personal too. The comparison makes me uncomfortable for sure. I’m still not able to justify it, but this time ’round I started thinking about the crimes committed against governesses that I don’t know much about.

      Thanks for your analysis of both topics, Alice. You make good points.

  2. cindie snyder Avatar
    cindie snyder

    Very informative post! Jane Austen must have seen alot!

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      Thanks, Cindie!

  3. M. L. Kappa Avatar

    Very interesting post. Thanks!

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      Thanks for reading!

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Always Austen

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading