What’s So Controversial About  the New Statue of Jane Austen?

Posted

in

, , , ,

by

(Photo credit for title image: Maquette of Jane Austen statue by Martin Jennings. Courtesy the artist/Steve Russell Studios)

In December of 2025, Jane Austen will turn 250 years old!  To commemorate the event, Winchester Cathedral has commissioned a £100,000 ($128,000) life-sized statue of the author.

Austen lived the last years of her life in Winchester and is buried in the cathedral, and the statue will stand near her memorial gravestone. 

The 5 foot statue will depict Austen, looking off into the distance, her fingers grazing the table that holds her paper, quill, and ink pot.

Martin Jennings, the artist, has sculpted many authors, including Charles Dickens and George Orwell.  Jennings also recently created the portrait of King Charles III used on commemorative coins.  Jennings notes that the statue of Austen will be “a work of imagination.”  He adds, “We don’t know very much at all about what she looked like. I want the sculpture to express her spirit.”

Water color of Jane Austen by sister Cassandra Austen, Photo credit: Cassandra Austen, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

Winchester Cathedral probably thought people would love this idea—or at least not care much about it—but it has sparked a wealth of controversy.  Here’s why:

  1.  The statue will lead to the Disneyfication of Winchester.

Elizabeth Proudman, former chairman of the Jane Austen Society, notes that the sculpture will be erected in the Inner Close, an outdoor courtyard “where the monks had a private area.”  She argues the statue will attract a crowd of tourists to this “special place.”  Proudman adds, “I don’t think we want to turn it into Disneyland-on-Itchen. I don’t think the Inner Close is the place to attract a lot of lovely American tourists to come and have a selfie with Jane Austen.”

I’m American.  Thank you, Elizabeth, for adding the descriptor “lovely.”  I’m a little worried it’s a British euphemism for “loud and obnoxious,” but I’m sure I’m being paranoid.

Catherine Ogle, dean of Winchester Cathedral, defended the location, saying the statue will “bring additional meaning” to the space.  She adds that the location was personal to Austen: “The Inner Close is close to the route [Austen] would have taken when visiting her nephews at the nearby Winchester College and her friends at No 12 The Close.”

Inner Close of Winchester Cathedral, Photo credit: JackPeasePhotography, CC BY 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

2. Jane wouldn’t have wanted a statue.

Austen’s work was not widely read until her nephew, James Edward Austen-Leigh, published her biography over 50 years after her death.  She was not famous in her lifetime, and Proudman notes that Austen was a “very private person” who “despised publicity.”  Proudman concludes that Austen would not have wanted this statue.

I question this.  It’s hard for us to know how Austen would feel about this statue, so any arguments of that nature are speculative and don’t feel valid.  But, eh, I’ll join Proudman and speculate, anyway: Writers want to be read—so I think Austen would have wanted her books read and celebrated, and this statue does that. 

3. Austen has enough monuments already.

Plans for the statue were originally announced in 2019, but the Winchester community revolted against the surplus of Austen memorials in their town, and the idea was shelved.  Now that the Cathedral has resurrected its plans for the statue, similar arguments are resurfacing. 

Austen’s grave was first marked by a stone inscription that mentioned her rector father and years of life and death. 

Jane Austen’s grave (inscription included at end of blog), Photo credit: Mark Hillary from Serra Negra, São Paulo, Brazil, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Over 55 years later, her nephew raised funds to add a brass plaque that commemorated her work as an author. 

Brass plaque at Austen’s grave (inscription at end of blog), Photo credit: Jane Austen memorial and grave, Winchester Cathedral by pam fray, CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The house where Austen died is also located in Winchester.

Photo Credit: Peter Trimming / House Where Jane Austen Died

Winchester residents say they already have the stone, the plaque, and the house, and, for goodness’ sake, that’s enough Austen memorials already! 

Phil Howe, founder of Hidden Britain Tours, adds that Bath is already guilty of the “hijacking of the Jane Austen brand,” and Winchester does not need to follow in its footsteps.

I hear these complaints, but as someone who’s had a lot of fun visiting Austen’s memorials, I’m all for another one.

Look, I’m just going to say it.  I’d take a selfie with the statue.  Also, I love Bath.  LOVE it.

Oh, no.  “Lovely American tourists” does mean “loud and obnoxious,” doesn’t it?

4. It’s a lot of money.

Any time £100,000 is being spent on the arts, people will question whether it should be spent a different way—or not at all.

Ogle, dean of the cathedral, says funds for the statue are coming from “a significant number of private donors and small grant providers keen to see in place the splendid and sensitive design by the acclaimed sculptor Martin Jennings. These funds are restricted by the donors to this project only.”

Got it, Ogle.  A raffle drawing for one lucky winner to get In ‘n’ Out for life would be fun, but these donors want a statue of Austen made by Jennings, so that’s how the money’s being spent.

5. It should be a statute of William Walker instead.

Who’s William Walker, you ask?  I did too.  I wanted him to be someone we could easily dismiss, but it turns out he’s a hero.  In the early 1900s, when the cathedral’s foundation was collapsing, Walker spent five years diving 20 feet into dark waters to save the historic building. At the end of each work week, he biked 70 miles home.  Winchester resident Michelle T. Fox-Rousell said, “If it was not for Walker there would be no cathedral, and thus no opportunity to waste money that should be directed elsewhere.”

William Walker, Photo Credit: John Crook, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

He sounds amazing.  Thank you, Walker, for all you did.  But the world has a lot of statues of white men, many of which already reside in the cathedral.  Would it be okay for Winchester to add one of a woman without people crying controversy?

That’s my two cents.  But I’m open to hearing people agree or disagree with me.  What do you think?  (And, if you were in Winchester, would you take a selfie with Jane?)

Click the banner to visit Kirstin Odegaard’s website.

Sources I used:

U.K. Locals Fear a Jane Austen Statue Could Turn Winchester Cathedral Into ‘Disneyland

Why is this new statue of Jane Austen so controversial?

Statue wars

What the pictures on Austen’s grave read:

Jane Austen’s grave reads–

In Memory of JANE AUSTEN, youngest daughter of the late Revd. GEORGE AUSTEN, formerly Rector of Steventon in this County.

She departed this Life on the 18th of July 1817, aged 41, after a long illness supported with the patience and hopes of a Christian.

The benevolence of her heart, the sweetness of her temper, and the extraordinary endowments of her mind obtained the regard of all who knew her, and the warmest love of her intimate connections.

Their grief is in proportion to their affection they know their loss to be irreparable, but in their deepest affliction they are consoled by a firm though humble hope that her charity, devotion, faith, and purity have rendered her soul acceptable in the sight of her REDEEMER.

Jane Austen’s added brass plaque reads–

Jane Austen

known to many by her writings, endeared to her family by the varied charms of her Character, and ennobled by Christian Faith and Piety, was born at Steventon in the county of ?? Dec xvi mdcclxxv and buried in this Cathedral July xxiv mdcccxvii

“She openeth her mouth with wisdom and in her tongue is the law of kindness” Prov. xxxi. v. xxv

17 responses to “What’s So Controversial About  the New Statue of Jane Austen?”

  1. budnrip Avatar
    budnrip

    I don’t understand the point of controversy

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      People do seem to like to argue about things.

      1. budnrip Avatar
        budnrip

        Wouldn’t it be great if people got along

  2. Alice McVeigh Avatar
    Alice McVeigh

    You make LOTS of good points here. However, I’ve seen the statue and it’s ugly, is why I’m against it. It doesn’t – to me – convey Austen’s wonderful spirit in the least.

    No objection to the idea of a statue of her at ALL, and one statue does NOT a Disney World make… It’s just that this one’s rubbish, unfortunately.

    I’m also reminded of my grandfather, General Maxwell D. Taylor, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who led the 101st Airborne by parachute on D-Day.

    He was asked if he wanted a statue of himself at West Point (which he attended, and also, in later years, led). He said, ‘No, no. I’d much rather have people ask, “Why isn’t there a statue of General Taylor?” than ask why there is one.”

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      Your grandfather sounds like a wise man.

      It’s an interesting point. What do you do if you commission a statue by a renowned artist and then don’t like it? Must be a tough conversation to have.

    2. Gianna Thomas Avatar
      Gianna Thomas

      I love your grandfather’s comment, Alice. 🙂

  3. Riana Everly Avatar

    I’ve been to Winchester, seen the plaque in the cathedral, walked to the house where she died. But no selfies. I’m not a selfie person.
    A lot of those arguments are, to me, nonsense. One statue does not Disneyland make, and there are certainly plenty of statues to other people (King Alfred, anyone????). Further, for people complaining about the money, that money would not otherwise be used for other things. If not for the statue, the money would not be there. It’s not being diverted from the roof fund. That’s not how directed donations work.
    If people think there should be a statue to Mr Walker, they are welcome to raise the funds for it. It would be a worthy thing. But it’s not a case of one or the other.
    My only objection is the statue itself. It’s not very nice, is it? Hmmmm…. Surely the artist could have come up with something a bit more visually attractive. Surely!!!

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      And maybe that’s the real reason people are against it, but no one wants to say it?

  4. Ginna Avatar

    FYI, the image you included is NOT “Water color of Jane Austen by sister Cassandra Austen”. The one here has been ‘prettified’. In Cassandra’s painting, Jane looks like she has a headache.

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      It has been, yes. I tried really hard to find a picture of the original without violating any rights. I thought it’d be easy because that must be in the public domain by now, but I had trouble and gave up. I gave it a good go, though. Sometimes finding the pictures is a bit of a headache.

    2. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      I found it! I replaced it.

  5. cindie snyder Avatar
    cindie snyder

    It’s not the prettiest statue. I agree something more visually attractive. The pics of her gravesite and plaque are good and the house.

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      Those are all beautiful. If we saw the statue in the courtyard of the cathedral, would we be touched by it and think it was beautiful to see in person (instead of in a photograph)? Definitely worth a trip to England to find out…

  6. Gianna Thomas Avatar
    Gianna Thomas

    I actually found the statue interesting, Kirstin. And I’m sure it looks better in person than in a photo. I’ve always wished we had a good painting of Jane Austen. It’s a shame that we don’t know exactly what she looked like. Would also like to know if she ever fell in love.

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      I thought the statue was kind of interesting too!
      Yes to both of those. Sometimes I think her real love story was with her sister Cassandra. They seemed to have a very special bond.

  7. Jean T Avatar
    Jean T

    I took one today as a “loud and obnoxious” Americanized Asian living <1 hour away from Winchester, though my friend was the one snapping the photo for me! I felt like the statue looked nothing like any of the paintings of Jane Austen, hence my happening upon your post to see what others think about the statue.

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      That is interesting that you got to see it in person! Glad you got a photo.

Leave a Reply to Jean TCancel reply

Discover more from Always Austen

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading