Jane Bennet Married DOWN: A Peek at Social Class in Pride and Prejudice

It’s true!  Jane married down, and Mr. Bingley married up!   The characters in Pride and Prejudice all seem to understand the nuances of social order, but for a modern reader, it’s a bit like stepping into a new world.  Before I started researching it, I thought that I (kind of) understood it, but I came across several surprises. 

To start, here’s a general outline of what it meant to be upper or middle class, the two classes most represented in the novel.

Upper class: This is the landed gentry.  These are the people who own land and do not have to work outside of managing their estates (i.e., Mr. Bennet hanging out and reading books in his library). 

Middle class: These are people who do not own land and have to get, like, jobs.  (Ew.)  They might rent and work another man’s land, making them tenant farmers, or they might own their land but have to work it themselves, making them yeoman farmers.  (If you own your own land but have to work it, you don’t count as landed gentry.)

The middle class also included people with professions, such as bankers, lawyers, clergymen, and those in the military.

There were divisions within these classes—what I would term the upper middle class, the lower middle class, the upper upper class, and the lower upper class.  Sound confusing?  Maybe, but it’s always been important to people to establish superiority.  These days, it’s harder, since we no longer have an organized system, but we still manage to create a hierarchy by comparing our numbers of followers, “likes,” and Stanley cups. 

What did these social class distinctions mean for the characters in Pride and Prejudice?  Let’s take a look at who married up and who married down:

  1. Mr. Bennet married down. 

Mr. Bennet owns Longbourn, and his estate brings in about 2,000 pounds a year.  This makes him landed gentry and part of the upper class. 

Mrs. Bennet, however, came from a middle class family in trade.  Her father was an attorney in Meryton.  Her sister, Mrs. Phillips, is married to an attorney, and her brother, Mr. Gardiner, is a merchant. 

The narrator notes that Mr. Bennet wasn’t thinking about upward mobility when he made the match, explaining instead that he was captivated by Mrs. Bennet’s “youth and beauty, and that appearance of good-humour which youth and beauty generally give.”  She was hot, and he had money, and that’s…still the basis for a lot of marriages today.

2. Elizabeth married within her class.

Elizabeth is landed gentry and upper class—just like Mr. Darcy.  In fact, she and her family are the “principal inhabitants” in their village, which means they are of the highest social class in their village.  No wonder Elizabeth was insulted by Mr. Darcy’s proposal.

Elizabeth tries to tell us this: “He is a gentleman; I am a gentleman’s daughter; so far we are equal.”  Hm.  When she says that, why do we as readers have the lurking thought that Mr. Darcy is a little bit more equal?

He’s richer, and he’s descended from nobility, and Pemberley is so big, and 10,000 pounds is so much more than 2,000 pounds.  But all that really means is that he’s more upper class than she is.  They’re still from the same class.  Plus, Mr. Darcy’s best friend is—get this—middle class.  Which brings us to…

3. Jane married down.

Jane, like Elizabeth, is landed gentry and upper class.

Mr. Bingley, however, does not own land and his wealth comes from…trade.  (Shudder.) 

Mr. Bingley’s father had intended to purchase an estate but never did, and in the beginning of the novel, Mr. Bingley rents (but does not purchase) Netherfield.  This is why Caroline Bingley hopes her brother will build a house “half as delightful as Pemberley,” or, at the very least, make his “purchase in that neighbourhood.”  What she is really saying is, “Purchase anything!  Just buy something and get us out of the middle class!”  Of course, to completely move into the upper class, Bingley would also have to cut all ties to his businesses that created his wealth—because wealth that comes from trade reeks of middle class.

It seems ridiculous that Bingley’s sisters criticize Jane for having an uncle who’s an attorney in Meryton and another in Cheapside—when they are the ones who are middle class.  But maybe Austen is observing that people don’t need a good reason to look down on each other.  They just go ahead and do it.  Perhaps it’s like how, previously, if you were a millionaire who didn’t own a yacht, you were decidedly less than, and now, if you’re a billionaire without a rocket, you’re just kind of dumb. 

Thanks for reading.  I’d love to hear your thoughts below!

Here are some websites with good information on the topic:

Social Class and the Bennet Family in “PRIDE AND PREJUDICE”

Social Rank in Pride and Prejudice

Click the picture to visit Kirstin Odegaard’s website.

16 responses to “Jane Bennet Married DOWN: A Peek at Social Class in Pride and Prejudice”

  1. Alice McVeigh Avatar

    You make a lot of great points here, but British society is traditionally ambivalent about money (which to this day – see Boris Johnson – is perceived as hiding a multitude of sins). Money may not be posh, but it’s imminently DESIRABLE. Also, Bingley HIMSELF has never been in trade. Also, the Bennets, though certainly gentry, were also definitely on-the-skids gentry. So: Bingley is very rich, separated from the middle-class by a whole generation and personally on the ‘up’: Jane Bennet is from a family of gentry, but one skidding down the economic scale… In my opinion, Jane married ‘up’. That Austen agreed is suggested by the reaction of the neighbourhood which, upon learning of Lydia’s elopement, had perceived the Bennets as marked out for misfortune – however, once Jane’s engagement becomes known, were perceived as the luckiest of all.

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      Yes, I agree that money is what is most valued, and I think Austen shows us that. By gaining money, Jane moves up in the world (and that’s pretty much true everywhere). That’s why I thought it was interesting to learn about the nuances that Bingley is technically middle class and Jane is technically upper class.

  2. Linda A. Avatar
    Linda A.

    So if one of the Bennet girls married someone like Colonel Fitzwilliam, would that be marrying Up or Down? Since he is the son of an earl but also in the military.

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      Good question. I had to do a little more investigating to find the answer. As the younger son of an earl, Colonel Fitzwilliam is upper class because of his connections to nobility. He’s in the same class as the Bennets, but his connection to his father makes him more upper class, so the Bennet girls would be marrying up. (Interesting side note: The daughter of an earl ranks higher than the younger son of an earl.)

      1. Linda A. Avatar
        Linda A.

        I could see that. Lady Catherine got to keep her “Lady” title, while Colonel Fitzwilliam would have only had “the honorable” title.

    2. Riana Everly Avatar

      Officers were considered gentry, and someone from the middle class who became an officer would be seen as having moved up in the world. Likewise, solicitors were middle class (they actually had to earn their money), while barristers were upper class (they were given ‘gifts’ from the solicitors for their contributions; a nice legal fiction). So Col F would definitely still be considered upper class, and his connection to nobility would make him A Catch.

      1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

        I remember you had great research on solicitors and barristers–thanks!

  3. cindie snyder Avatar
    cindie snyder

    Nice post! Seems like most people married down., but at least they were happy with whom they married.

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      Gotta love Austen and her happy endings!

  4. Gianna Thomas Avatar
    Gianna Thomas

    I’ve always disliked class distinction since it really is just someone trying or saying that they are better than someone else. When it boils down to it, we are all of one class: the human race. All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and we’re all in the same boat no matter how much power or money we have.

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      It is a sad reflection that we as humans are constantly looking for different ways to decide who’s better than who, isn’t it? I often think that if we all just had one common goal of trying to help each other, the world wouldn’t be so bad. Why don’t we all have that goal? Feels like a no brainer.

      1. Gianna Thomas Avatar
        Gianna Thomas

        I agree, Kirstin.

  5. Joanna Dugi Bachmeier Avatar
    Joanna Dugi Bachmeier

    Every bit as much as the people in her stories, Jane Austen featured as characters several dysfunctional societal conditions in which she lived~ the cruelly judgemental snobbery of the class system; women having to depend on marriage for their welfare, and place in society, and not generally having any other real means of living well and independently; their accomplishments being concentrated on such as needlework, music, dancing, reading, perhaps drawing ~ and other conditions were characterized in her other stories~ all of which limitations Jane herself rose above to communicate through her fine mind and writing.

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      Yes, well said–and Austen does this so subtly that it’s possible to miss her quiet critiques. I sometimes think that we’ve spent so many years withholding opportunities from women, half the population. How much more advanced could our society be if we hadn’t done that, and what a stupid thing to do.

  6. Jan Marie Avatar
    Jan Marie

    Interesting that the (middle-class merchant) Gardiners are the most sensible people in the book.

    I do wonder, if there was no Darcy and no Bingley, would any of the Bennet girls have married someone in the Gardiner’s class? Mr. Bennet made no real effort to introduce his daughters to eligible gentlemen; but they did spend time with their aunt and uncle.

    1. Kirstin Odegaard Avatar

      I agree–I think it’s no accident that the Gardiners are the most sensible! (And literal gardeners, helping Elizabeth and Darcy’s relationship to grow.)

      Interesting point. The Bennet women probably could have been very happy marrying one of the Gardiners’ acquaintances–or an acquaintance of Mrs. Phillips, who seemed well connected.

      Thanks for your comments!

Leave a Reply to Riana EverlyCancel reply

Discover more from Always Austen

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading