Did Mr. Darcy want his Friend Bingley to Marry His Sister?

Posted

in

, ,

by

The short answer is yes.

One of the most heated arguments I’ve witnessed in my time participating in Jane Austen Fan Fiction and the wider Jane Austen fandom is whether or not Darcy really wanted Bingley to marry Georgiana. This is a discussion I’ve always found strange, since it’s affirmed directly by the narrator, who even makes a joke about it:

Not a syllable had ever reached her [Caroline] of Miss Darcy’s meditated elopement. To no creature had it been revealed, where secrecy was possible, except to Elizabeth; and from all Bingley’s connections her brother was particularly anxious to conceal it, from that very wish which Elizabeth had long ago attributed to him, of their becoming hereafter her own. He had certainly formed such a plan; and without meaning that it should affect his endeavour to separate him from Miss Bennet, it is probable that it might add something to his lively concern for the welfare of his friend. -Pride & Prejudice, Ch 46

This quote confirms many things, 1. that Elizabeth long suspected Darcy of wanting to set up Charles and Georgiana, 2. Darcy thought it was important that Charles didn’t know about the failed elopement, and 3. Darcy is not as unbiased as he claimed to be in his letter.

Reminder quote: That I was desirous of believing her indifferent is certain; but I will venture to say that my investigations and decisions are not usually influenced by my hopes or fears. I did not believe her to be indifferent because I wished it; I believed it on impartial conviction, as truly as I wished it in reason. (Ch 35, from the post-proposal letter)

As an aside, I don’t think this bias is anything remarkable or condemable on Darcy’s part. We are all biased and influenced by our own wishes. Of course Darcy saw indifference from Jane when he wished to see it and love when he wished to see otherwise. It’s very human of him. It is pretty funny that he thinks he is somehow above bias.

(This is when Darcy suddenly can see that Jane likes Bingley, once he wants to see it)

One of the most frequent arguments that I’ve heard against the quotation above is that the paragraph is actually from the persective of Elizabeth Bennet, using that free indirect speech that Austen is famous for, but that just doesn’t hold water for me. It cannot be Elizabeth’s persepective because the quote contains information that Elizabeth could not have known. She has no idea that Darcy has been anxiously concealing the elopement specifically from the Bingleys. Instead, this paragraph is framed as a confirmation of what Elizabeth thought already; the narrator clearing up the facts.

The other argument is that Charles Bingley is too lowly to marry a Darcy, with the added scornful comment that Caroline was being delusional or lying when she suggests the match in her letter to Jane. However, if Darcy considered Bingley so far beneath him, they wouldn’t be interacting socially at all, much less being invited to Pemberley. Connections and who one was seen with was very important and we know it’s something that Darcy thinks about. Caroline is excited because Darcy is giving every indication that he wants the two families to become closer. Colonel Fitzwilliam tells us that Darcy spent the summer with the Bingley family and we know they spent the fall together at Netherfield. Darcy even has Bingley staying at his house in London during the winter. Darcy thinks very seriously about how poor Elizabeth’s connections are, there is no way he’d be spending this much time with anyone if he considered them a bad connection.

(Also, Caroline’s idea that one marriage between two families will bring another is echoed in Mansfield Park by both Edmund Bertram and Mary Crawford)

Bingley’s actual social class is vague. He is not in trade, his money is from trade. We know his father was already able to purchase an estate before his early demise, so the money was already accumulated before Charles came of age. In fact, when and how the money was made is not specified at all:

They were of a respectable family in the north of England; a circumstance more deeply impressed on their memories than that their brother’s fortune and their own had been acquired by trade. (Ch 3)

The Bingleys are nothing like the Gardiners, for example, who live within view of their warehouses and have to plan plot-critical vacations around business obligations. The Bingleys live as gentry even if they aren’t fully a part of that class and importantly, everyone in the novel treats the Bingley like gentry. When it comes to marriage, Darcy says that Bingley could do better than marrying Jane Bennet and Lady Catherine, snob extraordinaire, says Jane is the ultimate winner in her match:

I was told, that not only your sister was on the point of being most advantageously married, but that you—that Miss Elizabeth Bennet would, in all likelihood, be soon afterwards united to my nephew—my own nephew, Mr. Darcy. (Ch 56)

Elizabeth believing that it was Darcy’s plan to have them marry only confirms that it was true. She is a character in a Regency novel written during that era, so she would probably have a pretty good idea of whom is suitable to marry whom (certainly better than my ideas in the 21st century!). If it was an outrageous lie, Elizabeth would have rejected the idea outright as preposterous and comforted Jane with its impossibility. Elizabeth even spends time determining if Charles and Georgiana are in love when she meets both of them at Pemberley. She definitely believed that the marriage was a social possibility!

It is clear to me from the novel that the Bingley family have made it past the gatekeepers and are tenuously established in the gentry. With their wealth and connections, the Bingleys are likely to keep moving forward and higher into the upper class, especially when Charles finally buys an estate (thank you Bennet family for being so annoying that he finally did it!) and as Caroline likely marries into a gentry family. Therefore, a marriage between Charles Bingley and Georgiana Darcy is something that may have happened, if not for Jane Bennet!

The Bennet girls, on the other hand, were at a serious risk of falling out of the gentry class, especially if none of them managed to marry before the death of Mr. Bennet.

Lastly, I highlighted the fact that Darcy concealed the elopement from the Bingley family because I often hear the theory that Darcy wanted Georgiana to marry Bingley because he would overlook that indiscretion. Darcy does not seem to believe that since he has taken such care to keep the failed elopement a secret.

To conclude, it is stated in the novel that Mr. Darcy did indeed wish for his friend Mr. Bingley to marry his sister Georgiana. No one in the novel seems to believe there is a massive class divide between the Bingley and Darcy family and Elizabeth thinks the plan is very likely. However, the best plans of extremely wealthy men occasionally go awry, leaving Georgiana Darcy for the Jane Austen fan fiction writers to play with!

Who is your favourite match for Georgiana, post Pride & Prejudice? Let me know below!

19 responses to “Did Mr. Darcy want his Friend Bingley to Marry His Sister?”

  1. Alice McVeigh Avatar

    LOL. I saw this correspondence. Well done, you! – a perfect explanation of what so many fellow Austen fans on Facebook fail to understand – or rather, can’t BEAR to understand, imho.

    They’re certainly intelligent enough to understand what Austen wrote… The trouble is, they just can’t BEAR to think that their beloved Firth – oops, I mean their beloved Darcy – could have schemed as Austen gives us to understand that he DID scheme. (I mean, of course, with regard to his hopes that Bingley and Georgiana might someday make a match.)

    Had I been Darcy, and had the great good luck to have as good-natured and winning a friend as Bingley, and to possess as sweet and gentle a sister as Georgiana, I’d have schemed too…

    1. bdelleman Avatar
      bdelleman

      I am not sure I would go that far, it is a confusing paragraph and a very easy thing to miss. It is never shown in an adaptation either, which makes it easy to forget.

      But yes, Bingley seems like a great guy and a good choice for Georgiana. He just had other plans!

  2. mcmcbrayer Avatar
    mcmcbrayer

    I saw another reply similarly to you, using the same quote, on a Facebook post. I had never read that paragraph that closely before. I agree that everyone treats the Bingleys as gentry. I disagree that the Bennet ladies would have left the gentry class when Mr. Bennet died, however. I think that, like Miss Bates in Emma and the Dashwood ladies in S&S, they would have become impoverished gentry, still maintaining their social class but being seen as needing charity and worthy of pity.

    1. bdelleman Avatar
      bdelleman

      I did say, “in danger” I believe. They may have been like Miss Bates or they may have chosen to marry below their class. Austen reportedly told her family that Mary married a clerk in her uncle’s office, which would have been out of the gentry as Mr. Phillips was not the sort of lawyer considered gentry. But my main point was that with their tiny inheritances, the Bennets are far more vulnerable than the Bingley women.

      1. mcmcbrayer Avatar
        mcmcbrayer

        I completely agree they were more in danger. Mary definitely married into Middle class, as did Lydia technically in my opinion, since Wickham is a soldier but not an officer. Social Class was extremely complicated and it is hard to figure out coming from an American (in my case) modern perspective. I actually have to teach social class in Austen to my high school British lit students and it’s not easy. Kudos to you for addressing the issue!

      2. bdelleman Avatar
        bdelleman

        Thank you! In North America, we like to pretend we don’t have a class system anymore and we encourage people to try to better their cirsumstances, but we certainly still have *something* like class. I’m sure it’s hard to teach!

  3. Anya Avatar

    I think Darcy hoped Bingley and Georgiana would become attached to each other. It’s understandable that he’d want to protect her from fortune hunters and secure a husband who would treat Georgiana with respect. Having a brother in law who was so malleable and persuadable was certainly a bonus. But, I don’t believe he would’ve forced the match if she was unwilling.

    1. bdelleman Avatar
      bdelleman

      I totally agree with you! Darcy didn’t seem to want to be forced to marry his cousin, so I doubt he would have forced his sister to marry someone she disliked. But given how influenced Georgiana was by her brother, I think he would have been able to persuade her. The problem was Bingley, lol!

  4. cindie snyder Avatar
    cindie snyder

    Bingley probably would have been a good match for her. Definitely not Collins or Wickham! Maybe one of the officers? Love the post!

    1. bdelleman Avatar
      bdelleman

      Thanks!

      I like to think Georgiana married a rich William Price from Mansfield Park, he’s a really nice guy. There are so few good men left in Austen’s novels, lol.

      1. Anya Avatar

        Lowly William Price landing an heiress! The shock of it is probably what finally did Aunt Norris in 😉

      2. bdelleman Avatar
        bdelleman

        Lol, double bonus!

  5. anngreader11 Avatar
    anngreader11

    Aunt Norris definitely deserves to be gone.

  6. Devika Brendon Avatar
    Devika Brendon

    Look at the end of Chapter 33. ‘… and she was quite decided, at last, that he had been partly governed by this worst kind of pride, and partly by the wish of retaining Mr Bingley for his sister.’ Elizabeth thinks this. Because she imputes to Darcy ‘the worst kind of pride’ – and because she initially equates him with the Bingleys, to the exclusion of herself (and her family.) She does not perceive then the significant differences between Darcy’s family and Bingley’s. In fact, her perception is flawed by her own prejudice against Darcy’s pride. The friendship between the two young men does not indicate that Darcy had singled Bingley out for his sister. This is Elizabeth’s assumption.

    1. bdelleman Avatar
      bdelleman

      I don’t know why you would think that Elizabeth Bennet, citizen of 1800s England, wouldn’t be able to percieve class differences. I am sure she was well aware. And as I said, no one in the entire novel treats the Bingleys as less than.

  7. Cyrania De Bergerac Avatar
    Cyrania De Bergerac

    I could definitely see why Darcy would think Bingley and Georgiana would be a great match, outside of class aspects (though it would play a role). He would want Georgiana to have the happiness and security of Bingley while also wanting to help Bingley and his prospects out of genuine fondness for him since a marriage with Georgiana would anchor him firmly as a gentleman with ties to a noble family in the De Bourgh side of things.

    I have it as a major element of a vampire au I came up with where Wickham is one and turned Darcy into one after in revenge after Darcy prevented his elopement with Georgiana. Darcy then is trying to keep his condition under wraps and under firm control while he gets Georgiana married to Bingley so that she’s not left alone to have Wickham seek to make her his prey again. He plans to quietly kill himself after the marriage so that he doesn’t stain his family name and so he doesn’t have any chance of giving in to his new urges. But then Elizabeth starts disrupting things.

    1. bdelleman Avatar
      bdelleman

      That sounds really interesting!

  8. Alicia Avatar
    Alicia

    Thank you so much for posting this about the Bingley family. Caroline, Louisa and Charles were lucky to have a father that saved so the money could accrue for the next generation.

    1. bdelleman Avatar
      bdelleman

      No problem! They were lucky. I always wonder how he made so much though, it’s a lot of money.

Leave a Reply to Devika BrendonCancel reply

Discover more from Always Austen

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading